
Why Open Responses Reveal More
Casper assesses applicants’ social intelligence and professionalism using an open-response format that allows applicants to justify their reasoning and express their values.
Where most closed-response situational judgment tests look at the applicant’s ability to identify expected behaviours by choosing among prescribed solutions, Casper allows applicants to put their unique perspectives and lived experience into context and apply it to the situation before them.
The open-response format makes a meaningful positive impact for people from different demographic groups. Work published in the Journal of Applied Psychology shows that the open-response format in SJTs contributes to substantial reductions in group differences without impairing validity.
See How the Evidence Stacks Up for Casper
Study after study shows that Casper provides crucial, defensible data points in your review of applicants. We’re constantly evaluating our products and processes to ensure they are highly reliable and effective.

Valid
Casper results are predictable indicators of admissions performance and beyond.

Reliable
Casper’s methodology provides consistent, highly reliable results compared to personal statements and reference letters.

Fair
Casper consistently shows 25-50% smaller demographic differences compared to academic assessments.
Explore Resources
Academic Publications

Explore Casper Research and Publications
Review peer-reviewed evidence and research supporting Casper’s use in admissions.
Reports and Guides

Casper Technical Manual
See the technical evidence behind Casper’s design, scoring, reliability, and validity.
Reports and Guides

Beyond Grades: Why Situational Judgment Tests Matter
Learn how situational judgment tests add meaningful evidence beyond academic metrics.
Request A Demo
Meet with our team to see how Acuity Insights can support your program.
- Get a personalized demo
- Learn more about our products
- Get pricing information
"*" indicates required fields


