A Guide to Implementing Lottery Admissions in Higher Education
In higher education admissions, academic test scores and GPAs don’t tell the whole story of an applicant’s potential. This realization has sparked a shift towards holistic admission strategies in an effort to support a fairer admissions process.
Lottery admissions, a strategy that adds randomness to the selection process, has been used in the Netherlands and is emerging in North America. Introducing a lottery system into your admissions process has the potential to increase fairness and ensure a more well-rounded entering class.
Why lottery admissions?
Lottery admissions balance fairness and opportunity, improving outcomes when compared to in traditional methods. By including non-academic factors like lived experiences and soft skills, they offer a fairer admissions process.
Example:
- Applicant A: A working-class student with a 3.67 GPA, unable to participate in many extracurriculars due to financial constraints.
- Applicant B: A middle-class student with a 3.7 GPA, with ample extracurricular opportunities supported by family resources.
Traditional methods favor Applicant B, but lottery admissions allow a committee to recognize that slight GPA differences do not define potential success.
Lottery Admission Models
There is no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to implementing a lottery system into admissions. Discover the three main models of lottery admissions.
Threshold Lottery
Sets minimum criteria, ensuring academic preparedness but may exclude otherwise strong candidates.
Rubric Lottery
Uses a scoring guide to balance academic and non-academic factors, reducing the dominance of any single metric.
Formula Lottery
Combines various criteria into a weighted score for a comprehensive evaluation, aligning with institutional missions.
Aligning with Organizational Mission
A mission-aligned lottery process identifies applicants who reflect program values and incorporate the following considerations.
Assessing Skills
Evaluate both academic and non-cognitive qualities like empathy and resilience.
Integration
Ensure seamless integration with existing practices and legal standards.
Applicant Experience
Clearly communicate the lottery process to manage expectations.
Risk Management
Regularly monitor and adjust the process for fairness and effectiveness.
Casper and Lottery Admissions
Incorporating the Casper test, which assesses non-academic traits like empathy and communication, enhances fairness in lottery admissions. Threshold models can set minimum Casper scores, while rubric or formula-based lotteries can blend Casper scores with other criteria.
The Casper SJT supports fairness in admissions by revealing a broader range of applicant abilities, ensuring a fairer and more comprehensive admissions process.
Are you ready to learn more about how to innovate with lottery admissions?
September 26 at 12 PM – 1PM ET
Join the live Webinar
Implementing Lottery Admissions for a Fairer Future in Higher Education
Lottery admissions are not a one-size-fits-all approach. This webinar explores the broad spectrum of lottery admissions strategies, the benefits of integrating lottery admissions within a holistic framework, and practical insights for implementing a lottery admissions process.
Join Dr. Kelly Dore, Co-Founder of Acuity Insights and VP, Science & Innovation to learn how an innovative approach to lottery admissions can enhance holistic review practices, paving the way for a more dynamic student body.