Casper Shows Smaller Demographic Differences Than Knowledge-Based Evaluations

Summary/Highlights

Acuity Insights is committed to making more equitable, fair, and safe assessments for all applicants. Key design decisions of the Casper test helps us towards this goal:

 

  1. Test content built with a diverse group of subject matter experts that represent the broad community, not just educators and health care professionals.

  2. Behavioral tendency questions that ask applicants how they would act in a given situation, and why.

  3. Open-response format that allows applicants to explain their views and provide a rationale for their decisions.

  4. Responses are scored by multiple independent raters to mitigate individual implicit bias and ensure that an applicant’s final score reflects perspectives from a range of individuals who are representative of the community they will be serving. 

 

These design decisions make a meaningful positive impact for people from different demographic groups. Across quality assurance studies with partner programs, we have found that differences between African American or Black applicants (N=9,892) as compared to White applicants (N=62,557) is 48% smaller in Casper than in knowledge-based tests, and 28% smaller in Casper than in GPA. These trends have been observed in the literature as well for Casper1,2 and other open-response SJTs6-9. For example, a 2019 study with 9,096 applicants from New York Medical College showed that Casper had the smallest demographic differences as compared to GPA and MCAT1. For the study’s race variable, Casper showed 48-99% smaller differences. For the self-declared disadvantaged status variable, Casper showed 47-87% smaller differences.


Acuity Insights continues to invest in making admissions more fair and equitable. That’s why we’re working to implement Casper’s video response format. This allows applicants to more naturally answer questions, give their rationale, express their values, and show their reflection directly through their webcam. Pilot testing of this initiative has led to even further reductions in differences between demographic groups3-5.

Evidence/Resources

Publications and conference presentations on Casper showing smaller demographic differences than knowledge-based evaluations

  1. Title: Addressing the diversity–validity dilemma using situational judgment tests.
    Author(s) and Year: Juster et al., 2019.

Journal: Academic Medicine

  1. Title: Evaluating medical school admissions screening measures to promote diversity while relating to future clerkship performance.
    Author(s) and Year: Woodson et al., 2022
    Conference: American Education Research Association

  2. Title: For Constructed-Response Situational Judgment Tests, does response format moderate group differences?
    Author(s) and Year: Dore et al., 2021
    Conference: Association for Medical Education in Europe

  3. Title: Improving Fairness and Equity in a Situational Judgment Test: An Alternate Response Format.
    Author(s) and Year: Robb et al., 2022
    Conference: The Canadian Conference on Medical Education

  4. Title: Enhancing Equity in the GME Selection Process:  Altering Response Format to Reduce Demographic Differences 

Author(s) and Year: Robb et al., 2022

Conference: Learn Serve Lead 2022: Association of American Medical Colleges

 

Publications on how response format affects SJTs

  1. Title: An update on the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: A review.
    Author(s) and Year: De Soete et al., 2012.
    Journal: Psychological Topics.

  2. Title: Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research.
    Author(s) and Year: Lievens et al., 2008.
    Journal: Personnel Review

 

  1. Title: Testing divergent and convergent thinking: Test response format and adverse impact.
    Author(s) and Year: Outzz et al., 2006.
    Conference: 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

 

  1. Title: Constructed response formats and their effects on minority–majority differences and validity.
    Author(s) and Year: Lievens et al., 2019.
    Journal: Journal of Applied Psychology.

 

For more complete list of publications

  1. Publications page

Want to learn more about how programs see the smallest demographic differences in Casper?

  1. Texas A & M College of Medicine sees smallest demographic differences in Casper compared to GPA and MCAT

  2. Using Casper in your Admissions Process Guide

  3. Casper Technical Manual – Chapter 4: Research Examining Casper Performance Across Demographic Groups

 

Acuity Blogs

 

  1. 4 ways to reduce the impact of implicit bias in higher ed admissions

  2. Why holistic applicant review needs to be mission based

  3. The importance of test design to minimize bias and demographic differences in admissions

  4. Practical strategies to help reduce bias in admissions